Monday, 13 May 2013

Thoughts on "Chihayafuru"

The story is amazing. It's just as good as Hikaru no Go in terms of pacing and it's even more realistic - in that it focuses on several players' abilities and develops the whole team.

Manga art sucks though, can't compare with Takeshi Obata.

Wednesday, 8 May 2013

Thoughts on "Hikaru no Go"

Spoilers ahead -
Also, Rurouni Kenshin live action was horrible. Futurerant/

Just briefly - I don't understand much about the game of Go itself but the series would probably closely resemble the perfect Go game: well balanced players and tactics, a well balanced battle all across the 19x19 squares but intense.

I learnt Go (weiqi) when I was 9. My dad had a cheap, foldable board from his student days and we'd play matches every now and then. I never had the patience for it and preferred Chinese chess because it seemed much more straightforward. I guess there's a curious subtly to a game which you need to "set up" on the empty playing field and then slow carve out areas of "territory" and capture/encircle the opponent's pieces. It certainly lasts long - nothing would be obvious from the first few moves, especially for an amateur, all the pieces look the same, unlike in Chinese chess (losing a pawn is like losing a finger, losing a rook is like losing an arm or a leg).

I was surprised that I enjoyed this - having just finished catching up with the anime about competitive kurata (more shoujo) I was not expecting Hikaru no Go to be this good. But it was. I feel a bit too old for Naruto, Bleach and One Piece or Yugioh..or Prince of Tennis..or Beyblades. So when I found out that this series was about a young kid who learns to play Go competitively, has a rival and competes all the time, I thought I would really only enjoy the first 20 episodes and spend most of the time skipping pointless dialogue. Well, that did not happen. There were no fillers. Every episode was a bloody cliffhanger and left me watching and thinking and getting excited over the next twist in the story... deep into the night.

The manga art is by Obata Takeshi, the creator of Death Note and Bakuman, among many other series. If I had time, I would definitely read it just for the art. The anime was not too shabby either and it ran for 75 episodes.

The main character was quite the brat for most of the story...until his mentor and friend Sai disappears. Then it all changes. It was like having the ground swallowed up from underneath and in its place, a deep, unfathomable vortex appears. Nothing is certain anymore.

HIkaru stops playing and he changes in ways which make all his conceited childishness in the previous 50-odd episodes worthwhile. He was almost likable as a main character in the earlier episodes. Two things I deplore about this series was the portrayal of the young characters and their relationships with their family.

I suppose it might just be Japan but 15 year olds do not move out on their own where i come from. Nor do you disappear for 2 days and 1 night without telling your parents!

Also, the indoor smoking was a bit ridiculous. Maybe Obata Takeshi or the author Hotta smoked as well. But almost every adult character whips out a cigarette at some point, with the exception of Touya Kouyo, who only seems to wear his hakama and glare with a stern face...until his collapse. Then he becomes human. He actually smiles for the first time. It was a relief to know that Akira was related to a human being and therefore human himself.

I love shonen tropes. The rival, the companions, the suffering and hardship for a worthwhile result, learning to become yourself or who you are etc and improving. If only real life was like this!

-

A note about ships. There were points in this series where I imagined the dialogue was so serious it actually created a comical effect instead. Mostly, it was the Akira/Hikaru rivalry which left me in stitches every now and then. It was definitely a good series and somewhere in the fandom world, Akira is probably married to Hikaru with three Go-playing children for calling him his "eternal rival" :P

-

Thoughts after reading manga and re-watching anime

Apparently Obata Takeshi is very healthy and does not smoke or drink.  So I guess he downs black coffee and energy drinks when pulling an all-nighter, like Mashiro Moritaka of Bakuman.

I am still not over the ending. Having pulled me through a roller-coaster of emotions, I feel betrayed at the end. It wasn't a *bad* ending but it was not satisfying either. Either the ratings for Hikaru no Go went down and the editors decided to end it or Hotta Yumi couldn't come up with anything better. At the end, I was wondering if Shindou was ever going to beat Touya or even be evenly matched or if he would ever reach a fraction of Sai's ability in Go. That's a lot to mull over. I mean sure, Hikaru's "evolution" is not yet complete and he's 15 and all...but man. That was just way too much of a cliff-hanger. I don't mind that Sai did not make any come backs, - which is as it should be. His goal in teaching Hikaru the game of Go was complete and Hikaru has come pretty far. It's quite obvious that Hikaru is Sai's successor...(the fan?) but in ways, I wish he ended on better footing with Akira. At chapter 189.2, it was like he would lose  again and the most they every do is bicker at the Go salon...

 All of this aside, I have much respect for Obata's art style. The attention to the clothes (the anime had some really bad clashing colours and patterns going on) even the growth of the characters - Both Hikaru and Touya lose their baby fat and I had fun comparing their faces from earlier to later sections - mentally and physically were great touches which made this manga so enjoyable. But the ending has still ruined it. RUGHGHGH.

This is seriously interfering with my revision. I can't even think straight...

Saturday, 4 May 2013

Thoughts on "Ustopia", "We" and relation between "Self" and "State" (I)

Dystopia is Anti-Utopia
Which in turn means anti- "imagined place or state of things in which everything is perfect."

First used in Utopia (1516) by Sir Thomas More. Literally "Nowhere" ("Erewhon"), the title of his book about a an island and it's inhabitants.

To this place doesn't exist.

More recently, Margaret Atwood has coined the phrase "Ustopia" which is her creation where qualities of dystopia are embodied in utopia, or utopia in dystopia. The word she uses is "latent". Personally, I think it would be a Utopia for anyone until you found out what you were missing - so technically, there would be no traces of one in the other.

Or one can imagine it as a completely white room where the walls and floors are the same and people walk around like on the Moebius strip or an unending staircase. There are no shadows. Everything is the same colour. Newtonian physics don't work properly in this space but people don't question it. That might be described as Utopia, in the most reductive sense.

People are walking from A to B. 

Dystopia would be the moment they realised that something is not perfect. One person inside this vast, white room realises that there is a corner. He is walking perpendicular to the floor but also to another wall. Or he realises that there is gap in the page which he has never seen before. This suddenly gives the person perspective and realization that he has been walking around but trapped in this room, walking.

So this person realizes that they are walking from A to B but actually in the same place. They have not moved. Therefore they have been tricked into this.

And so on. It's a fairly simple way to imagine Utopia/Dystopia. For me, Atwood appears to be saying that "Ustopia" is the moment when you realize that you have realized that one cannot be without the other. You are on the threshold of understanding that you live in Dystopia but recognise this because you realise what is missing, which would make this place a Utopia. Or viceversa. Technically, this "threshold" point doesn't exist because as soon as you realize your lacking something, you will be living in a Dystopian world.

It's like the "points of change", "maxima" or "minima" on a curved line in planar geometry.

Friday, 3 May 2013

Thoughts on "Bakuman"

...the anime.
genius. self-referencing.
g
--
Reversi's demons look just like the ones from Death Note >^<;;;;;;; i can't stop crying
--
when did he learn how to drive?
why is this is painfully lame?